"The danger to America is not Barack Obama, but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the presidency. It will be easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to an electorate willing to have such a man for their president. The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails us. Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The republic can survive a Barack Obama. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president. -- Author Unknown
Sexually Transmitted Disease
The most serious risk to our nations health since the 1918 flu epidemic.
virulent strain of Sexually Transmitted Disease. The disease is
contracted through dangerous and high-risk behavior. The disease is
called Gonorrhea Lectim..And pronounced "gonna re-elect 'em."
Many victims contracted it in 2008, after having been screwed for the
past two years. Naturalists and epidemiologists are amazed at how this
destructive disease has become since it is easily cured....by voting
out all incumbents!
Labels: Congress , Election , revolution
Supreme Court--on Political Messaging
Supreme Court Gives Corporations, Unions Power to Spend Unlimited Sums on Political Messaging
Corporations, trade associations, unions and nonprofit groups still aren't allowed to make direct contributions to federal politicians, but today, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that such groups may now spend unlimited amounts of money advocating for or against politicians.
In doing do, the Supreme Court, led by Justice Anthony Kennedy, tossed out the distinction between individuals and corporations and their ilk when it comes to independent expenditures.
"This Court now concludes that independent expenditures, including those made by corporations, do not give rise to corruption or the appearance of corruption," Kennedy wrote in the majority opinion in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. "That speakers may have influence over or access to elected officials does not mean that those officials are corrupt. And the appearance of influence or access will not cause the electorate to lose faith in this democracy."
Chief Justice John Roberts, Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia joined Kennedy today in overturning Supreme Court precedent that relates to these restrictions. They were not persuaded by the rational for distinguishing between the wealth of individuals and corporations. Nor were they sympathetic to the anti-corruption argument.
The court's more liberal bloc -- Justices John Paul Stevens, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor -- disagreed.
Labels: corporate , Election , Supreme Court
Ralleys
Lets see, Yesterday I was at a protest in front of Senator Bennet's office. He had a meeting where he spoke to invited guests only. Really, he just doesn't get it, from his comments about us in this mornings paper. He says he wants more reasoned debate, yet he won't talk to anyone with opposing ideas. He says he wants less rhetoric but it seems to me that his side is full of rhetoric. He said that "our politics seems unbelievably trivial and unhelpful," and opposition to the health care bill is simply unhinged from the facts. Gawd I hope he's voted out of office this next election. Chosen, not elected, the first time.
Now today I went to a kick-off rally for the upcoming election season for conservatism. Some great motivational speakers talking up the caucus system of choosing our candidates. Good stuff, I bought a book and had it signed by the author who was standing there.
I didn't know that Colorado is one of only three states that still has the caucus system. We are very lucky to have it, it truly is grass root politics.
TEN FOR '10: WINNING WASHINGTON BY EMPOWERING AMERICANS
TEN FOR '10: WINNING WASHINGTON BY EMPOWERING AMERICANS |
|
Labels: capitalism , Democrat , economic , Election , entitlement , federal , government , law , party affiliation , Republican , revolution , social , taxes
Who better to bundle
Regulations intended to shed light on bundling by lobbyists are coming up short. According to an Associated Press review published last week, which compared invitations to fund-raisers hosted by lobbyists and campaign finance reports filed with the Federal Election Commission from March 19 through June, lawmakers have yet to disclose funds they raised at 195 events.
Although the Honest Leadership and Open Government Act requiring lawmakers to report cash “bundled” by lobbyists went into effect in March of this year, Oonly about two-dozen lawmakers between then and June have reported funds raised by lobbyists, the AP found, even though the Honest Leadership and Open Government Act requiring lawmakers to report cash “bundled” by lobbyists went into effect in March of this year. What can a lobbyist do to escape disclosure? Don’t touch the money, don’t take credit, raise less than $16,000 (the threshold for reporting, which does not include contributions from the lobbyist and his/her spouse) or work as an in-house lobbyist for a business, union or trade association and have your employer officially sponsor the event. HLOGA was passed in 2007 in response to the Jack Abramoff scandal, but the AP concludes that “the circumstances under which a member of Congress is legally bound to disclose a lobbyist’s fund-raising are so narrow that, had the law been in effect during Abramoff’s lobbying days, it wouldn’t have exposed much, if any, of his congressional fundraising money trail.” The Hill reported a similar story this week.
From The Capital Eye Blog
Labels: bureaucracy , Democrat , Election , federal , government , legal , party affiliation , political , Republican
Two women seeking the Republican nomination
WWE Chief Executive Linda McMahon Brings Strong Democratic Ties to Her Attempt to Smackdown Chris Dodd
Published by Michael Beckel on September 16, 2009 6:40 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)
McMahonWWE.jpgLinda McMahon, the chief executive officer of World Wrestling Entertainment, announced today she's seeking the Republican Party's nomination to upset incumbent Democratic Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.). (She also announced that she would be resigning from her WWE post to focus on her campaign.)
But McMahon's history is hardly that of a hardcore Republican.
McMahon and husband Vince McMahon, who is the chairman of the WWE, have contributed nearly $90,000 to federal candidates and committees since 1989, the Center for Responsive Politics has found. And of this sum, 51 percent has gone to Democrats and 47 percent has gone to Republicans.
opensecrets
Can you say Rino!!!!!
Jane Norton formally enters Senate race
Saying she had become "more and more alarmed about the direction our nation is headed," Jane Norton, a Republican and former lieutenant governor, formally launched her 2010 campaign for the U.S. Senate today with rallies spanning the state, including one at the downtown Antlers Hilton.
Norton's theme here and at appearances in Denver and Grand Junction was the size and reach of the federal government.
"At every turn, Washington's giant hand seems to be grabbing everything in sight," she said, "seizing control of our car companies, banks, insurance companies, exploding the national debt and chipping away at individual liberty."
She promised to be "a senator who will stand up to big government power grabs."
gazette
Labels: 2010 , announced , Colorado , Election , government , Nominee , party affiliation , political , Republican
Lack of bipartisanship
Steele and the RNC should be continuously pounding the media with commentary about the total lack of bipartisanship as a deliberate tactic by the Democrats, particularly by Reid in the Senate and Pelosi in the House. The Dems have done everything possible to lock the Republicans out of any debate regarding legislation and most people are unaware of this.
It is a totally cynical attempt at capitalizing on their takeover of government by completely excluding opposing viewpoints.
From RedState
Labels: Democrat , Election , federal , government , Obama , Partisan , party affiliation , President
Freakin' Franken
I really gotta wonder about the people of Minnesota. I mean come on. first that WW wrestler guy and now this funny man freakin' Franken. Or like they said in the paper this morning "former comedian" yeah right". Minnesota's supreme Court made a wrong decision.
Labels: Democrat , Election , Frankin , party affiliation , political , Supreme Court
Complaint against Wally World Dismissed
The Federal Elections Commission has decided to dismiss a complaint by labor groups that accused Wally-world of pressuring employees to vote against the Commiecrats in last Nov. election.
This kind of left wing nonsense reminded me that during the Nov. election, my wife,(member of the teachers onion)(errr union)was mailed, EVERYDAY, pure union propaganda, all pro Obama. They spared absolutely no expense on the large heavy paper, glossy print, color full page ads.
Just part of the millions or billions or trillions of dollars the unions spent towards the election of Obama, that now is going to be repaid, tenfold, back to the onions.
Sorry about the millions, billions, trillions part. With my dyslexia and all those zeros I can't tell 'em apart anymore.